[VIEWED 13347
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
Sahayatri
Please log in to subscribe to Sahayatri's postings.
Posted on 02-07-05 8:56
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Nepal Congress to join hands with Maoists SILIGURI, Feb. 7. ? The Maoist movement in Nepal is likely to gather mainstream political momentum soon. As part of the planned movement of political parties of Nepal in a same platform, the Nepal Congress Party has decided to welcome Maoists and join hands with them. (cited from paramendra's thread and originally from "the statesman" patrika) Kasailai Kehi bhannu chha aba????
|
|
|
|
KG4MVP
Please log in to subscribe to KG4MVP's postings.
Posted on 02-07-05 9:24
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Yup !!! Only in Nepal ....
|
|
|
prem_dai
Please log in to subscribe to prem_dai's postings.
Posted on 02-07-05 10:07
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Wich faction of Congress? Girija or Deuba? Perhaps Deuba faction cannot join hands with Maoists since his govt. declared Maoists terrorist. What's the link of thenews??
|
|
|
Sahayatri
Please log in to subscribe to Sahayatri's postings.
Posted on 02-07-05 10:21
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Prmji, the remaining parts of the news is: During an interview with The Statesman today, the central committee member of Nepal Congress Party and the party organisation chief, Mr Krishna Prasad Sitoula said that almost all democratic political parties of Nepal, including Communist parties, have joined hands to put up a fight against the Nepal?s King Gyanendra, who has dismissed the government and taken all powers in his hand. Mr Sitoula said that the Nepal Congress, the Nepal Communist Party UML, Janmorcha Nepal, Nepal Mazdoor Communist Party, Nepal Sadbhawna Party, Ananda Devi and alliance of five small Communist parties of Nepal have come together on a platform to start a movement against the monarchy. He said: ?We are not against the Maoists? demands. We support their ideology regarding the monarchy. But we don?t want the path of violence.? Mr Sitoula added that they would hold discussions with senior Maoists. (Cited from: http://www.thestatesman.net/page.news.php?clid=2&theme=&usrsess=1&id=67922)
|
|
|
salambambi
Please log in to subscribe to salambambi's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 6:31
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I am glad they have ganged together. We see the true color now. At least, this will be the end for NC and UML. It is getting exciting...
|
|
|
hangoolama
Please log in to subscribe to hangoolama's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 8:01
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Nothing is impossible in Nepal, tesma pani PARTY ra teska Neta haru. Je pani Bhanndinchha je pani Gardinchhan
|
|
|
Dalvat
Please log in to subscribe to Dalvat's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 8:09
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Party source said (undisclosable) Girija and Madav kumar Nepal in their telephone conversation with Comrade Prachanda that they will accept his leadership and join their movement if Maoist assure tham not raising the past corruption issues of them and their collegues and also never harm their proporty in the future.
|
|
|
pyaj_ganayo
Please log in to subscribe to pyaj_ganayo's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 8:23
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
This clearly shows how curropt and unhumane people in Mulitparty Democracy. They are crazy than any one in the world and there is no worst thing that can be compared with them. Pigs, who eat shit, even they are bit loyal. Now we can see their clear face. We need king to get rid of these dirty minded, I don't even have bad words to describe them. Lets all support king. Without us these freaks are nothing.
|
|
|
zalimSingh
Please log in to subscribe to zalimSingh's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 11:07
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
i cannot believe these guys. i am at a loss for words. these politicians remind me of the bhusya kukurs in my neighborhood. when they have the whole neighborhood to themselves, they constantly fight amongst one another. whenever a new threat emerges, they surprisingly gang up against the new threat. just goes to show how untrustworthy these damn politicians are. these mofos are utterly selfish and completely unreliable. at the cost of repetition, let me just echo dalvat's post because it captures everything that needs to be said: "party source said (undisclosable) Girija and Madav kumar Nepal in their telephone conversation with Comrade Prachanda that they will accept his leadership and join their movement if Maoist assure tham not raising the past corruption issues of them and their collegues and also never harm their proporty in the future. "
|
|
|
prem_dai
Please log in to subscribe to prem_dai's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 11:15
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Please let us know the source/link to the following news. We shoudl not comment until we are sure the news is correct or at least some newspaper published it. "party source said (undisclosable) Girija and Madav kumar Nepal in their telephone conversation with Comrade Prachanda that they will accept his leadership and join their movement if Maoist assure tham not raising the past corruption issues of them and their collegues and also never harm their proporty in the future. "
|
|
|
pyaj_ganayo
Please log in to subscribe to pyaj_ganayo's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 11:22
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
|
|
|
shirish
Please log in to subscribe to shirish's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 11:50
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I don't think Congressi will join the Maoist. Nepali Congress Maobadi ?? The name does not seem right for me. Maoists are the byproduct of the rules of these congressi's. How can they collabrate? its not going to work out. The king and his administration will make it look like Moaists are the traitors if they do not come to the negotiation table and will try to win the support of India. Anyway, the indians support the king from behind. King will be stronger if Moabadi's dont come to talk, at least superficially.
|
|
|
haku
Please log in to subscribe to haku's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 11:58
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
As I had said earlier, these so called netas are so pathetic! Moreover, they don't mind becoming terrorist themselves. Wouldn't joining a terrorist organisation (in their own words) make themselves the terrorists. And half of the Nepalies are so stupid that they follow the Netas blindly without even a pinch of conscious. ma kay bhanu? its almost unbeareable just to imagine.
|
|
|
confused
Please log in to subscribe to confused's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 2:18
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
king might be eliminated?? can that be a option too??
|
|
|
suvachintak
Please log in to subscribe to suvachintak's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 2:40
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
confused you are really confused Haku you are right
|
|
|
nitu
Please log in to subscribe to nitu's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 2:46
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
All nepalese people, Parties and King must be very very careful with Girija Koirala. He will do anything whatever he likes. He does not have any concern about Nepal, Nepalese and country's situation. He is more than stupid and corrupted crook. He can betery Nepal and Nepalese any time any moment. If Nepal can be sell like comodities or goods, B.P and Girija Koirala might be sold Nepal to India. These people can not trust what so ever..... We better watch out Girija.............
|
|
|
Pachtharey Kanchha
Please log in to subscribe to Pachtharey Kanchha's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 2:55
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Jasaree Maoist haru lai bal deyana nee pailey GPK ley, tesaree nai bal didaina Prachanda bro ley.
|
|
|
ajsab01
Please log in to subscribe to ajsab01's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 2:56
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Kudos to Zalim SIngh: You took my words... " these politicians remind me of the bhusya kukurs in my neighborhood. when they have the whole neighborhood to themselves, they constantly fight amongst one another. whenever a new threat emerges, they surprisingly gang up against the new threat. " Like these dogs, our leaders also rely on others to throw food to them or they have to do "bhrastachar" ..they can't earn their livelihood by themselves.. Oh man, I am at loss of words to explain these netas' chartikala.."GU Lai Kottyayer ganayo bhannu bhanda, nakotyaunu nai jati..hoin ra????
|
|
|
suvachintak
Please log in to subscribe to suvachintak's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 3:14
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
ya that is very very correct- nitu jee dont dissregar this message..........giraj have already sold over 10 big nepali company to india while bp koiral was Pm he reduced our army force to 4000 so that india can take over that was when king Mahendra was the king......................so that tells a lot they are trying to sell nepal to india.....................Save nepal
|
|
|
suvachintak
Please log in to subscribe to suvachintak's postings.
Posted on 02-08-05 3:28
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
India suspends military assistance to Nepal A week into the King's power grab there is still a lot of dust settling. The biggest news is India's decision to suspend military aid to Nepal and they have taken other measures to show they're strong disapproval of the King's actions, such as refusing to attend the upcoming SAARC conference. It's not completely clear why India has taken such a strong stance, though it fits within their broader approach to Nepal, which has been to support multi-party government. It could possibly be a combination of the widespread outcry from the Indian media over Gyanendra's action and the Indian government's shock at their stand on the situation being expressly contradicted. http://www.satribune.com/archives/200502/P1_arun4.htm
|
|