[VIEWED 132753
TIMES]
|
SAVE! for ease of future access.
|
|
|
|
RiceOwls07
Please log in to subscribe to RiceOwls07's postings.
Posted on 06-12-08 11:56
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
4
?
Liked by
|
|
“Monarchy is over in Nepal”. The same title is being used in fashionable
ways by many media in this world—of course, only those who hold significant
stake in Nepal. The biggest stake holder and the director of Nepal’s devastation is Nepal’s closest and sadistic neighbor, India. Even though the intellectuals are familiar
with this direction, I would like to show why the world remains anonymous of
this India’s sponsorship of terrorism
in Nepal. Quite surprisingly, the actors have created a
huge mass of junior actors in the hope to make them a lead actor one day. In the mean time, the director is enjoying
the show. Let’s trace back when the
director thought to direct this inhuman movie that might not leave the director
an option of bankruptcy if the truth is exposed.
As known to the world, Nepal was a Kingdom and the most
peaceful country in this chaotic earth.
While many may disagree, however, there was no extreme poverty in Nepal in mid 20th
century. The Indo-Nepal friction started
when the then Prime Minister of Nepal—Jung
Bahaur Rana—supported the British India to
suppress the Sepoy Rebellion. In 1857, India could have born, but since the Rana prime
ministers of Nepal
were strong allies of British, they supported British in their mission to crush
any independence revolution. In fact, Nepal had
already become an enemy of Indians then.
Moreover, the strength of Gurkha army was the biggest obstacle for the Indians
to overcome. Because of Rana’s support
for British India, the later known India could not gain independence
until 1947. Many of us forget to note,
immediately after India was
born, the Rana Empire was thrown out in Nepal in the year 1950. The then Prime Minster of Nepal—Mohan Shumsher Rana—was deposed who would
later go to India
on a self imposed exile. His titular
successor—Pashupati Shumsher Rana—still resides in Nepal. His role would come into play post the Royal
Massacre of 2001. Until 1950, Ranas were
the prime rulers of Nepal
and the monarchy was only symbolic. When
India was born in 1947, the
then prime minister of India
was Jawarharlal Nehru—the same leader who kicked out Indira Nehru for marrying
a Muslim, who would later become India Gandhi and the biggest enemy of Hindus
and Sikhs.
There was another family who was fighting for the
Indian state with the Indians—the Koiralas.
Koiralas were Indians who were born in the Northern Province of British
India –modern day of Bihar or Uttar Pradesh in India. Koiralas were three brothers who were born
and raised in India. The family claims to be originally from Nepal, however, their roots and bushes have been
found only in India. Even today, much of Koirala family resides in
India—respecting
the motherland. The Koirala brothers
joined struggled to give birth to India. During the later years when India was about to born, Koiralas were suggested
to form Nepal Congress Party within India. Finally India
was born in 1947 with another new nation—Pakistan. Appropriate justice does not seem to be
carried out looking at the area of India
and Pakistan
and the number of people residing. The
most important factor was religion. Most
of the princely states were to join the Union of India. One of the biggest Kingdoms was the Kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir whose King Raja Hari
Singh was a Hindu and the population majority was of Muslim. Raja Hari Singh decided not to surrender his
Kingdom to either of the countries.
However, illegally, India
annexed the Kingdom into its Union. It is interesting to see how Indian text
books claim this beautiful Kingdom a part of India. In the last days of 1948, a
ceasefire was agreed under UN auspices demanding plebiscite. Nehru never proceeded with the UN resolution
and hence, the ascertainity of the instrument of accession is questionable. The
Kingdom—as falsely claimed by India
and Pakistan—is
still considered as the international disputed territory. Then India
annexed the Kingdom of Gwalior, and the Kingdom of Hyderabad. By all means, they were illegal annexation. India’s
vulture eyes were gazing the Kingdom
of Sikkim and the Kingdom of Nepal. The Indian Congress had helped create Nepali
congress for a good reason. The Indians
had foreseen their fortune in Nepal. The Koiralas were assured by the Indians that
they would help Nepal merge
into India if the Indians
help throw the Rana regime in Nepal. India was lured with this Childish
Koirala Deal. Even a newborn child would
see the benefit in helping the needy brothers.
Finally, in 1950, King Tribhuwan fled to India to seek refuge from the
Ranas. The only Royal member left was
the 3 year old, the then prince Gyanendra.
The Ranas—who were expert in analyzing the future—were familiar with the
Indian game. The Indians had thought to
end the monarchy in 1950, but the Ranas, moving a mile ahead, crowned the 3
year old as the King of the Kingdom
of Nepal. The Koiralas’ and the Indians’ dream
shattered. The Ranas knew that India wanted to weaken Nepal by
overthrowing monarchy. Hence, they took
the wisest step to save Nepal,
and we witnessed the result. Even though
the Ranas were able to save Nepal’s
monarchy, unfortunately, their Empire was brought down. Since Ranas were the true Nationalists, their
downfall encouraged India to
envision a possibility to annexing Nepal
into India.
Not that easy as the Indians had presumed. The King in Nepal was considered the
reincarnation of Hindu God, and replacing the intuition of Monarchy was their
far dream. They figured where the
problem laid—Monarchy. Nevertheless, India
did not stay quiet, and offered Sikkim and Nepal to sign the instrument of
accession and join the Union of India
Nepal’s the then King Mahendra got infuriated with the proposal, whereas
the “Koirala equivalent” prime Minister of Sikkim offered Sikkim in the hands
of India, only to be slaughtered. The
three Koirala brothers became the prime ministers of Nepal
on the recommendation and pressure from India. This paved an easy path for the Indians to
observe Nepal
more closely. Nepal’s
monarchy was well aware of this Indian strategy, however, the then King Birendra
had declared Nepal
as the Zone of Peace in the 90s. This
was endorsed by more than 110 countries of the world, except India. Intellectuals could smell the stink that was
coming from the southern block. King
Birendra’s popularity almost made India’s dream a nightmare. Moreover, the future King Dipendra was one of
the most popular figures of Nepalese monarchy in the history.
India’s dream was almost impossible. As the Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi created
LTTE in Sri Lanka, they
thought to help launch a Maoist revolution in Nepal
to break Nepal. The Maoists’ top demand was the abolition of
Monarchy. Since the year 1996, India started
funding Nepal Maoists to fight against state.
As the Maoist party was formed in 1996, their leaders were backed up by
the Indian government. Most of the Maoists leader lived in Darjeeling,
Lucknow, and Delhi
in India
and masterminded their plan. These plans were executed by guerrilla who lived
in Nepal
and were dying to fight war. In other words, India
created Communism in Nepal.
They also were supported by the Indian Communist leaders and other Naxalite
group who are fighting against the Indian government for communism.
Surprisingly India never
helped Nepal government in
arresting those leaders and extraditing them in Nepal. When Nepali Maoists met
Nepali Communist leaders in Lucknow, India in 2003, India
government did not take initiative to arrest them, even though they were
recognized as terrorists by the United
States. Hence it is evident that India never wanted peace in Nepal. At the same time, international media was
busy defaming the King Gyanendra.
The interesting chemistry was all political parties
held discussions in India
with the Maoists in the Indian’s presence.
The irony was Maoists were able to kill Inspector General of Police of
the Royal Nepalese Government, but were not able to kill any leaders. This does not digest well. These Maoists and leaders were in agreement
not to kill each others leaders. Although
India
was successful in proving why they did not endorse “Zone of Peace”, they were
unable to offer prayers to King. Then India
played the worst game with the help of its own citizens—Koiralas, and Maoists
to end the Nepalese monarchy—which the world today knows as the Nepal’s Royal
Massacre.
After the Royal Massacre, many speculations were in
the air. However, immediately after the
incident, media, which are funded by India, started to air against
Gyanendra, who was the only heir left to the throne. India’s, Koirala’s and Maoists’
strategy was to defame monarchy and most importantly, the monarch who was
unknown to the world. India knew that
King Birendra was most popular and if the blame could be dumped on Gyanendra,
it would be the easiest way to uproot monarchy.
And so was the story we witnessed.
India
had a sound plan to kill the Royal Family so that no one else would remain
alive to keep the monarchy breathing.
However, the massacre happened when King Gyanendra was out of town and
allegedly was on the way back to the massacre site for the dinner. Gyanendra was crowned again as the King of
Nepal, and India,
once again, could not prove to be a successful director. India funded media were airing
speculations about King Gyanendra. The
love and respect for the King was then seen by the shaved head of all the
Nepalese—who respected Nepalese Monarch as their father. Noticeably, the present Prime Minster, Girija
Prasad, the same Indian Citizen, was the Prime Minister of Nepal during the
Royal Massacre. He helped India
facilitate the killings. Later, he also
facilitated King Gyanendra, to be removed from the palace. In other words, the Koiralas were well aware
of the killings, but instead of stopping India to kill the royals, the old
traitor helped them successfully execute the plan.
The King wanted the then prime minister Sher Bahadur
Deuba to hold the elections but even after he was granted to extend the date of
election twice, he was never motivated to hold the election. The underlying
political reason was that he continuously wanted to be in his office by
postponing the election. As a Chief of State, King Gyanendra could not wait to
see his country devastated. This made him to sack the cabinet and impose his
direct rule. Subsequently, in October 2002, King Gyanendra dismissed the prime
minister and his cabinet. While stopping
short of reestablishing parliament, the king in June 2004 reinstated the most
recently elected prime minister who formed a four-party coalition government. The
King, citing dissatisfaction with the government, dissolved the government in
2005, declared a state of emergency, imprisoned party leaders, and assumed
power. The king's government subsequently released party leaders and officially
ended the state of emergency in May 2005, but the monarch retained absolute
power until April 2006.
When King Gyanendra ascended throne in 2002, Nepal has been
going through civil war from the past ten years. Politicians of Nepal, as an
easy excuse to take benefit from inexperienced King imposed blame on him. When
King sacked the parliament for its inability to hold elections, the law was
enforced, the administration was healthy and the environment was getting
conducive. He acted tough on the people to enforce laws. The 12 years of
democracy by then had made Nepalese lazy and incompetent, but the king wanted
to abolish the ongoing crisis. While most of Nepalese were pleased to see this
progress, the corrupted people were unemployed. The leaders of Nepal are
barely educated to find a job, if they do not engage themselves into politics.
The government employees who never showed up on time were forced to be in the
office and corruption was strictly made illegal. How can idle Nepalese like
that? Obviously it will make them revolt. These led the politicians ally
together and form a coalition to fight against the King. Nepal and
Indian media supported well these coalition leaders. Countable 10-15 people
gathered for to restore democracy and started protest. It was not until April
2006, when Maoists joined the movement to fight against king. Truckload Maoists
entered the capital city to revolt. As a way to spread violence, Maoists
attacked on Maoists in the revolution process and charged King for their
deaths. After 30 people were killed, the King gave up all the powers and
reinstated the government. Hence, the King who wanted to make the country
progress was iconized as a dictator. Following that, if anyone in Nepal supports
nationalism, then they are labeled as royalists or a dictator.
Now that the monarchy is gone, common Nepalese who are
die hard fans of King, are looking for their God. However, Hinduism and Buddism have not taught
violence to Nepalese. Maybe that’s why
common Nepalese are not on the streets yet.
I remain unanswered, is Hinduism’s patience tested? Is Gurkhas’ blood tested? Are the Nepalese tested? Nepal has so far witnessed the Maoists crowd,
not the Nepali crowd, there will be a day when Gurkhalis will be on the streets
to show the bravery of Amar Singh Thapa, Bir Balbhadra Kunwar, Bhimsen Thapa,
or another Jung Bahadur Rana…and who knows, another Prithvi Narayan Shah to
Unify the breaking Nepal.
http://newsblaze.com/story/20080619175135tsop.nb/topstory.html
Last edited: 21-Jun-08 02:59 PM
|
|
|
|
BihariBabu
Please log in to subscribe to BihariBabu's postings.
Posted on 07-30-08 11:17
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Last edited: 10-Aug-08 12:51 PM
|
|
|
BihariBabu
Please log in to subscribe to BihariBabu's postings.
Posted on 08-03-08 2:58
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
|
What is this again? Nepalis don't have anything else to do? Just writing bad about Indians? Commentary / Editorial
|
Image : www.gurkhas.com
|
Nepal’s VP Jha: An Insult For Gurkhas
Saturday August 02 2008 00:01:10 AM BDT
Much
is in the news that Nepal’s first ever Vice-President took oath of
secrecy for his post in Hindi language. Unknown to this controversy,
Mr. Jha knowingly sparked this communal outrage despite knowing that
“Hindi†is not a language for “any†ethnic Nepalese. The criticism was
certain.
Madhesis—people living in the Southern part of Nepal—share common
culture with some people of the northern province of India. Nationalist
Madeshis have serious objection to the word “Indian Origin†associated
with them. In fact, there was no such thing as “India†when Madeshis
used to live in Nepal. Madheshi a race in Nepal, and portraying them as
people of “Indian Origin†is putting their identity in crisis. Madeshis
always existed in Nepal; history does not support anywhere that
Madeshis migrated from British India. Labeling Madeshis as Indians is
India’s mere strategy to gain control over greater Nepal.
Because of the cultural similarity, Madeshis preferred to be closely
associated with India. However, they were not able to see the visionary
approach of Indian expansionism over Nepal. The fact that Madeshis were
ignored in Nepal was because of the lack of Madeshis to be a “Nepaliâ€.
Their upbringing was more “Indian†rather than a “Nepaliâ€. Most
Madhesis get married in India, and send their children to India for
higher studies. I remember while having conversation with a fellow
Madheshi, they used to say, “If a problem arises in Nepal, we will
cross border to Indiaâ€. This implies that they never truly believed
that Nepal belongs to them equally as the people of Pahadi origin.
Madeshis’ upbringing has major deficiencies for not letting them to be
Nepali. They are hesitant to speak in Nepali, wear like Nepalese, or
identify themselves as Nepalese; yet, they claim they have been denied
of fundamental rights.
There have been issues of racism; this fact cannot be ignored. However,
the astute nature shown by Madeshis to break Nepal into their regional
interest in unacceptable by any ‘Nationalist Nepaliâ€. The proud of
being a Nepali can only be understood if you learn to be proud of what
you have. We are lacking the visionary approach here to understand the
matter of complex foreign affairs involved. The people’s war started
against the atrocity of the government to change the system—not to
introduce a regional war. After the Maoists agreed to end the bloody
war, the self interested parties showed their opportunism. They
realized that was the time to bargain. After three years of bargaining,
Nepal is getting smaller everyday, people are turning against their own
fellow Nepalese, and India’s dream to break Nepal is succeeding. We
Nepalese have acted foolishly in this matter. Despite knowing the
“cruel†nature of India, Nepalese are fighting within themselves.
A joint approach from all Madeshis, Pahadis and other ethnicities, can
uplift Nepal to the level where Nepal deserves to be. Nepalese have not
mastered to be the “fraud†as their Indian counterparts are—which gives
a clean image of Nepalese to this entire world. It is the time to
understand what lacks within us that is hindering us from progressing.
Why Nepalese cannot stand strong to resist India and be prepared to
launch a war against India if a need arises?
The history of Gurkhas evidences the bravery because of which no umpire
on earth could rule this land of Gurkhas. The federal system of
division based on ethnicity will further invite a clash of two
different ethnicities. If people of Nepal truly want a federal state,
why are they not pushing the agenda of “Greater Nepal†to reverse the
Sugauli Treaty? After all, India has illegally captured our land. Why
can’t Nepal expand its border towards the South while India
continuously attacks Nepal’s border? Madeshis’ presumption that India
cares about them is erroneous. Ethnicity has been used as a tool to
gain political recognition by leaders. We should take precaution here.
Let the Nepalese not be derailed from the path of “Nationalism†and
divert you towards “ethnocentrism†by these leaders.
We must realize, our Nepal, is in great danger and needs to be rescued.
It was unfortunate for Nepal the day British Umpire left India. Since
the day India was born, Nepal has been on the edges of annexation by
this unfriendly neighbor. India presumes that the entire people of the
world who resemble South Asians are Indians. In the foreign land, if
they see any South Asian, they question “What part of India are you
from?†People remain shocked about this inference. Without any
reasonable justification, they falsely presume everyone to be Indian.
It is their lack of knowledge that makes their brain revolves only
around India, but they seek opportunities only in the outer part of
“their worldâ€. This shows their nature of upbringing.
Hence, the oath taking of Nepalese Vice President in Hindi language
strengthens India’s views that Nepal is India. Nepalese should not
afford India an opportunity for this false presumption. His using of
Hindi language has not only humiliated the Madheshis, but the Nepalese
throughout the world. He has attempted to unofficially recognize Nepal
as part of India. This act must be deplored, and it needs a worldwide
protest. No act of comprise with Nepal’s sovereignty should be
tolerated. Nepalese must be united to fight for their recognition, and
if need be, this leader should be arrested in charge of violating the
Nepal’s constitution and the spirit of the people. So far, the Justice
system in Nepal has failed due to the inability of the justices to grab
power and ensure a fair checks and balance. This serves as an
opportunity for the Supreme Court of Nepal to show that judicial system
stands by the truth and cares for the nation equally as the citizens of
Nepal.
The lack of patriotism could be blamed for this act. Ethnicity and
Nationality has no correlation. At this hour, Nepal’s sovereignty is
threatened; yet, we are looking for self interest. This is the time to
be united and flourish the glory of our motherland to the entire world.
Together, we can do it. The bravery and intellect garnered by our
forefathers will prove to be true eventually and we can unify Nepal
again as the founding father Prithvi Narayan Shah did. http://www.bangladesh-web.com/view.php?hidRecord=213541
|
|
|
BihariBabu
Please log in to subscribe to BihariBabu's postings.
Posted on 08-10-08 12:51
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
|
seriousnepali, i thought this was a public forum. I am here because I
find it interesting. I did not know Nepalese hate India this much. It
is good to get a clear message though. I think we Biharis and UPs need
to demand a separate nation as well. Indians and Nepalese all have
misused us. Imagine, what would you have done if you were born in
Bihar? You can accept a Bihari person but not a person from Bihar. You
all contradict in some form. First you must know what you like and
hate. What is the reason you hate us? If you hate us, we will hate
you. This game will be going on. So kick the a$$ of this writer who is
against India. I also ask the admin to delete this posting.
|
|
|
ek@l
Please log in to subscribe to ek@l's postings.
Posted on 08-10-08 1:13
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
look at ur attitude MF bihari. we hate because of ur attitude. don't ever think that u guys r smart. u guys r now growing coz u're slaved by british and develop the foundation for u.
if u change ur attitude, everybody will love u. don't ever think that if u put ur neighbour in fire, u r gonna stay safe. it might take sometimes but its gonna destroy u.
and one more thing, all of our MF leaders who were in india and somehow have some sort of attachment with india will die soon. some of them due to age and some of them will by new nepalese progressive force. after that we will b fine. once we eliminate some leaders then there won't b any problem
we'll see MF. we will see
|
|
|
BihariBabu
Please log in to subscribe to BihariBabu's postings.
Posted on 08-20-08 9:47
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
|
Last edited: 24-Sep-08 10:55 PM
|
|
|
BihariBabu
Please log in to subscribe to BihariBabu's postings.
Posted on 09-24-08 10:55
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
1
?
Liked by
|
|
Ek@l sorry for delayed response. I was holding meeting with your leaders lol. at least your leaders are with our leaders are.
|
|
|
RiceOwls07
Please log in to subscribe to RiceOwls07's postings.
Posted on 02-02-09 7:57
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
This is the time to evaluate what we have done. Witnessing the heinous present condition of Nepal, we may want to revert back Nepal's decision to be a republic. The good old days were much better. Nepal Army is the only institution that we can depend on now to save Nepal. The parties are on the verge to disappear Nepal from world map. We hope this never happens.
|
|
|
aaisha
Please log in to subscribe to aaisha's postings.
Posted on 02-04-09 12:49
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I agree wid u...those so called biharis said nepalis are losers??? Well if they really want the proof of losers then they can come to our country's footpath and see their people begging money, selling pani puri and banana with their dirty unwashed hands, and carrying tokari on their head to earn 50 cents...hahaa Moreover, they sleep on roads and don't have any other thing to wear other than faateko dhoti...hahaahaa Nepal is the best...THey are cheaters, thieves who steal our history and tag their name on it
|
|
|
Borntoberuled
Please log in to subscribe to Borntoberuled's postings.
Posted on 02-04-09 2:57
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
How dare you bihari?..HOW DARE YOU.. you first look at yourself and THEN dare to point your dirty finger towards us.. laaz nabhako..j pani bolechha!! "Well...whatever you all say.........Nepal is too small for us to care about..." "Your country Nepal has become a state of India now. Just waiting to see a change in the map. Your head of state and vice presidents speak Hindi. They are Indian. I think he should have taken oath in Bhojpuri as it is the language of great Bihar. Now even the PM will be Yadav and your country will be eventually the Land of India and the Kingdom of Yadavs. Jai Bihar!" WAT IS THIS???? You are fcking insane man..u need serious psychiatric help..A SERIOUS ONE. Do you even think before posting anything?..or do you know a bit of history? But I can understand..people like you can never rise above this...you are meant for this..you look dirty from outside u r dirtier deep within..and you still ask us if we have any reason to hate you.. You will be hated for ages to come!!.. i wish i could drive out all of you from Nepal BY MYSELF!! JAI NEPAL LONG LIVE NEPAL...http://www.sajha.com/sajha/chat/smileys/npflag.gif l
|
|
|
gorkhethito08
Please log in to subscribe to gorkhethito08's postings.
Posted on 02-04-09 6:42
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Mujhi Bihari, Tero buddi kando ma cha pakh nepali le lat hane pachi balla tero buddi aauncha.
|
|
|
roker
Please log in to subscribe to roker's postings.
Posted on 02-05-09 12:39
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
WHY ALL OF US TALKING AGAINST BIHARI...HE EVEN DONT KNOW ABOUT HIS COUNTRY AND THE HISTORY...ARE BIHARI BABU..DONT U KNOW DA FIGHT BETWEEN SRILANKA AND INDIA...U WANNA KNOW THE FIGHT OF THE INDIA WITH OTHER COUNTRIES..DO U KNOW THAT ALL THE INDIANS GOING IN OTHER COUNTRIES DONT DECLARE THEMSELVES AS INDIAN..DO U KNOW WHEN A TAMIL TIGER KILLED UR EX PRESIDENT...DO U KNOW WHEN A SRILANKAN SOLDIER BEAT UP RAJIV GANDI IN THE WHOLE STADIUM IN SRILANKA..DO U KNOW ABOUT THE DIRTY POLITICS OF UR COUNTRY....DO U KNOW HOW YOU GUYS ARE KNOWN IN THE INDIA...BIHAR IS KNOWN AS THE TRASH OF INDIA...AND AS A BIHARI U TOO.. A HOLES OF INDIA...PROUD TO BE INDIAN...WHT DA F@CK... EVEN DONT KNOW UR OWN POSITION IN DA WHOLE COUNTRY AND CRYING FOR DA COUNTRY...SEE WHT U ARE AND WHT U ARE DOING..WHOM U FIGHTING AGAINST...DIRTY PEOPLE OF THE DIRTY COUNTRY..GOD DAMNET...HAVE U EVEN GONE OUT OF BIHAR...HAVE U SEEN DELHI AND CALCUTTA...SHIT DIRTY PLACE I HAVE EVER SEEN..AND I DONT WANNA TALK ABOUT BIHAR....IF DELHI IS BAD THAN CALCUTTA IS WORST..GO AND ASK WITH OTHER INDIAN ABOUT BIHARI..AND GIVE ME A FAVOR..DONT TELL THEM U ARE BIHARI..COZ U WILL SHAME ON URSELF....TRASH OF THE SOCIETY...U BIHARI...
|
|
|
no_quiero
Please log in to subscribe to no_quiero's postings.
Posted on 02-05-09 4:33
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Bekar ma Bihari babu sanga k jhagda garnu. Bihari babu, I don't even support a ethinic Langauge in the president and vice president oath ceremony. Language should be such that everybody understands. Many people in nepal does not even understand Hindi. So Only thing that was acceptable was to take oath in Nepali which majority of Nepalese understand.
|
|
|
murkhano1
Please log in to subscribe to murkhano1's postings.
Posted on 02-05-09 2:59
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Mathi ko article ta ramrai sanga analyze gariyeko raichha. Ek patak ta socha badhya banaundo racihha. Huna pnani sakchha hola. Aakhir ma Gyandendra le ta kehi nagarikana afno bichara kurshi ko balidaan garyo. Mora Prachanda, Girija haru ta na marunjel kurshi ke chhodchhan hola ra. Ekpatak pheri rajtantra tir jana man lagi sakyo. Hami sabai jana Nepali road ma utrer pheri rajtantra lyanu aawashakta jasto malai dekhiyo. Saathi haru ko ke opinion chha yes bare ma?
|
|
|
dekchidriver
Please log in to subscribe to dekchidriver's postings.
Posted on 02-05-09 3:09
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
BihariBabu = rabblerouser. Be gone pest!
Last edited: 05-Feb-09 03:19 PM
|
|
|
dekchidriver
Please log in to subscribe to dekchidriver's postings.
Posted on 02-05-09 3:38
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I'm sorry, but I have to comment again. Mr. Bihari Babu, I called you a rabble rouser, but turns out you are not. You sir, are, what people in your language call, a "choot ka dhakkan". How condescendingly you presume that your country is bigger and hence overshadows us? Please dont take the liberty of speaking for all 1419 Million people in your country, as I'm pretty sure you aren't the elected representative sent out to be the voice of India. In other words, your opinion is NOT welcome here. Yes it is true, that Indian businessmen have a strong grip on the Nepalese economy. It is also true that the Indian government is trying its level best to make us 'honey producing bees' like the nation of Bhutan. But let me tell you this my friend, it isn't going to be a walk in the park for your country to do that. I mean just look at you trying to storm over our forum like its your piece of Bihar? No! Not gonna happen. Access Denied! I also hope you do realize what you are sparking off could well be a full blown hate war. You are trying to win a game by showing off, but you're in the away team's court. Go back to your own turf and preach Mr. Bihari Babu. I don't hate Indians. Just the ones that think like you do. There arent a lot of people that think like you do Mr. Bihari Babu, but the ones that do, are enough for us to hate on. Even educated, appreciative Indian folks detest the likes of you. I would love to categorize your kind into a group of your own so that we may distinguish between the 'good Indians' and 'bad Indians' but I'm still waiting for someone to coin the exact term. Shame on you. Don't you have universities in Bihar?
|
|
|
murkhano1
Please log in to subscribe to murkhano1's postings.
Posted on 02-06-09 6:06
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Kina lageko hola bihari ko pachadi, problem ta hamrai ho ni khasma, hami le nai mauka deko ho yiniharu lai nepali ko barema kura katne. bekkar ma ke ghagda garnu testa sanga. baru mathi ko article ko barema kehi prakash parun ki?
|
|
|
chhimobu
Please log in to subscribe to chhimobu's postings.
Posted on 02-07-09 6:07
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
BihariBabu, Mind your language. We are Nepalese and proud to be Nepalese. I am presonally warning you. If you humiliate Nepal and Nepalese, be sure your life in danger. When Chhimobu trigger gun, your yadav family will not save you, mind it!
|
|
|
KaleKrishna
Please log in to subscribe to KaleKrishna's postings.
Posted on 02-07-09 8:50
AM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Seek the change in you, let us build the new Nepal of our choice not by hatred but by watchfull inclusion. The Biharibabu username is one of us playing the negative persuasion, but let us understand that this in 21st century will need more of human approach over such racial issues. Hence, learn to respect and get the respect you deserve and calling someone down will not make you up anyway. Hence, just use your wits and wisdom part over mere Gorkhe tato ragat and its amplifications. I am happy for the nationalistic feeling but the time demands more than that.
|
|
|
murkhano1
Please log in to subscribe to murkhano1's postings.
Posted on 02-08-09 1:28
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
Last edited: 10-Feb-09 11:49 PM
|
|
|
murkhano1
Please log in to subscribe to murkhano1's postings.
Posted on 02-10-09 11:50
PM
Reply
[Subscribe]
|
Login in to Rate this Post:
0
?
|
|
I agree with kalekrishna, we need to play an active role rather than criticizing these dumbo leaders.
|
|