Nepe you have shown disdain to anomymous posters many times. Wake up NEPE, because if I am not mistaken more than 99% of the posters in sajha are anonymous. Anonymous people are discussing about things and answering each others questions here in sajha. Seems like you don't have the balls to answer questions directed at you, and you don't have the balls to continue discussions by answering valid questions.

Don't be pleading your way out citing anonymous posters reason. If you don't want to discuss with anonymous posters then you should not be posting or discussing in sajha. Or wait, do you only discuss with anonymous posters who agree with you? and who love you for quoting your own lines. Wah Nepe Wah!

kina nepe nepe bhanira bhanya....khadkaji bhanoona....

You did exactly what you wanted to, that is fine by you, but my question to you is not only cynicism, but a genuine concern for some unsolicited questions from the people who knows me and decent numbers of e-mails of underserved praises, which it might sound "strange" to you, you help ignite.

I do not know if he could withstood or not, but you certainly are not withstanding with a pre-determined hints which was obvious enough for many ? so much so that, I have to take it out to you, for my personal peace of mind.

"Well! Sir, if you aren't sure or don?t want to reveal it, then its wrong to put doubt on peoples mind.... ki kaso hazur?"

Now, that you have done it, I was only hoping you would be man enough to categorically either deny of having any knowledge or if you do, "at least" spit it out, if you can not prove it. I would still want to believe you are capable to withstand your words, not hide in the ambiguity of words like many. Or are you claiming nepotism blatantly?

If it pleases you, you can log in another nick and orate your so certain claim, completely forgetting that, there is another way too. And that is known as asking the concerned suspect. Oh I forgot, you are ?certain? about him/her ni haina?

Anyways, glad you at least listened to a "fawning" part of my suggestion on your first day in sajha. Indeed I shall show interest on the "new"user. :) But there are people who need not creat another log in ID to state what is obvious. Just so you know.

I am still hoping against hope that you would me man enough to state what is obvious to you, now that you have already put doubts on many. :).

Waiting (still)
IndisGuise:)

Goo haru lai nachaulu nai besh. Ganaucha matra.

TALKIN" "BOUT YERSELF SAROJ ? CAN'T AFFORD TP FOR YO BUMHOLE ? he he

BathroomCoffee ,
Yellow card! Mind ur language!

manepalihokya ,
>K ina nepe nepe bhanira bhanya....khadkaji bhanoona....
LOL!
Dr. Khadka nai bhannu parne ho bhahira Bhe, Yaha pardaina kya. Sajhako majja ni.

Yo DADADOODOO,
Who tha fug are you to come tell me what to do ? This ain't NEPAL Dada..he he ONE can do what One wants here. UNLESS u weren't aware...or talkin' 'bout the show on the tele ......he he he

fug sir, ali careful otherwise you will get a red card. :D

Where r u Newuser?? Hiding somewhere with a tail between your legs. Did you learn any lesson?

ALso Nepe did you learn any lesson?

Peace

Hahaha Highfly bro,
Newuser will roam around sajha as much as time and San permits. Head, tail, lessons....Keep on trying more so that you can force a genuine reply from me. I also hope lessons have been learnt. :)

And Indi bro, I am surprised why you are pushing me? I think I have already clarified my position. Now let me burrow your own words if you do not mind. If it pleases you, you can register another nick on my behalf and orate whatever you have imagined about my certainty. I shall applaud you if you got it right.:)

BTW, I don't think anything can be proved unless the perpetrator pleads his guilt. And here we are discussing on a cyber forum, not in a credit approving agency; in front of anonymous sajhaites, not in front of a jury.

Its my honour to know that you would show your interest on me. I doubt if I deserve such a gesture at all. Many thanks though. And please do not waste your time waiting me in this one. Hope to have more discussions with you in other topics. :)

OK enough said. Now I shall leave the field for you people to play your games. I will enjoy watching you all from the stands. :) :) :)

Newuser bro,

Why am I pushing you? Are you blind? Read the first paragraph of my last post again, What does that tell you?

"You did exactly what you wanted to, that is fine by you, but my question to you is not only cynicism, but a genuine concern for some unsolicited questions from the people who knows me and decent numbers of e-mails of underserved praises, which it might sound "strange" to you, you help ignite."

I am my own man newuser, and you talking all farts and no shit have effectively put me here. If I have to disagree to him, I would do this in my name. And next time before you use your obviously gifted magic bowl and claim, paint others, THINK. It's fine if you can not help it, but when you drag someone, at least be a man enough to put it bluntly, instead of chickening out.

And yes this is an anonymous forum, but the person in question in whose favor your show your nepotism, newuser - is NOT. That is precisely WHY; I for one would not be hideous. The very reason he is known in person is reason enough for me not to dwell creating another pseudo name. I would CHOOSE to do it in my known moniker and go with the flow.

Why should I log in another name "Mr. I know"? Last I checked it was you who claimed he need not read the third word to know who exactly the poster was.

You might not be the only one who have had doubt due to style of presentation newuser, but guess what, they chose to ask. But, you, in your itch to please had to throw the crap.

And talking about finding the truth, if you claim to be his "well wisher" you could have asked your suspect in person, i.e., email or at least here in sajha. But then again you know "everything" don't you? Sorry, I forgot. : )

And if that person's words are not enough to at least accept the probabilities of you being wrong, then you could have tried asking San. However unlikely it is for him to dislodge the privacy of the user, I presume, MAYBE he can state two users are from different state, without even naming the state. U.S having fifty states would give your suspect at least 49/50 chances of proving his innocence. That way, your wanna be Sherlock holmes baby-tooth would have been more maturel, instead of creating doubts on me like a ruckus.

Let me make it evidently clear that I am making all this effort because we are talking about a person whose real identity goes beyond the circle any one coterie. I might disagree/argue with him, yes, but I would not stoop to the level you might choose to or that very person does.

Tyati ho, abu kurya chaina.
IndisGuise:)

Indiji, Apologies for breaking my words in the earlier post that I won't come back again.

What do you mean? Do you think I told the people who you got emails from, that Anti_G is indisguise? Or my replies in this thread suggests that you are him?

If your friends suspect you, why should I take the headache? Just reply them that you are not if you are not. If it is the later, post the proof here. Finished.

About users from different states, Sherlock Holmes would certainly ask what if one prepared the write up in one state and than mailed or faxed to his friend in the other state, who logged in with the username Anti_G and posted it ? OR that from two different countries. Even A G ALberto Gonzales cannot settle this dispute, forget about San.

I am sorry for your ordeals but I don't think you've got to defend your innocence presuming that you are my suspect, as long as you are not a part of the ploy.

If you want me to declare in sajha that indisguise is not my suspect, declare categorically that you are not Anti_G. So much so that you have tried to implicate yourself in the dispute, not me. Mind you.

Now tell me where have I indicated that it's indisguise? Get a proof and I can sincerely apologize.

Rest assured, I am fine with you. :)

Newuser dude,

You have hinted evidently clear. :). Anyways, here is to our new twist. . .

You said: "If you want me to declare in sajha that indisguise is not my suspect, declare categorically that you are not Anti_G."

First, You know "Mr. I know what no one knows" , I always thought, it was "innocent till proven guilty," your account tells me it is "guilty till I prove my innocence". I wonder which coterie of radicals believes in this ;). I do not know :). Hehe.

You see now I have understood you how lopsided you are. In my last post, I emphatically stated this.

"I might disagree/argue with him, yes, but I would not stoop to the level you might choose to or that very person does."
"If I have to disagree to him, I would do this in my name."

What do these words tell you? I wonder what you read and what you understand. I am not an inflexible person newuser unlike you, I am not showing any rigidness and am categorically denying it. I am sorry I do not have a magic bowl to show who exactly is anti_g. But I reckon you do. LOL.

I wonder would you even do your bit now.

Now, moving on to another part, It's not my friends who suspects me newuser, but other sajhaities who knows me, and then some who does not. And many have mentioned that, you have quite evidently hinted it, which I could very well see. But do not get carried awaywith "suspect" word. They simply asked. Well to those who went on to express joy, my simple response were, I am not the right one to deserve, neither slack, nor praise for this.

Whereas, after reading this . . .

"About users from different states, Sherlock Holmes would certainly ask what if one prepared the write up in one state and than mailed or faxed to his friend in the other state, who logged in with the username Anti_G and posted it ? OR that from two different countries. Even A G ALberto Gonzales cannot settle this dispute, forget about San."

I have understood what school of thoughts you belong to. You got me on that one. : )

Somewhere you mentioned, " I used to quarrel with some sajhaites myself in early days. But I have learnt from my experience that it was useless." --> LOL, what did you learn? ;)

Whereas, listen to what you had to say.

"Anti_G, your writing is so unique that it didn't take a third sentence TO KNOW who YOU are."

"I am absolutely clear that you are someone else disguised as Anti _G and its your foolishness TO THINK THAT I CAN'T DISCERN YOUR writing. You got the clue already, haven't you??

"I am SURE I KNOW you."

-----What even your A G ALberto Gonzales can never settle, you already did. No one can settle but I can ni hoina newuser. Bravo. You seriously have some magic bowl newuser. Did you write a letter to A G ALberto Gonzales that you could ?sure?ly settle what he never can? ;)

I have stated my stand, and the good about that is, from now on I am in peace with myself no matter how much other radicals throws their obviously pea head logic. You and I never had obdurate, inflexible argument newuser. Somehow we have agreed to disagree amicably. Make no mistake; this might as well be the end of it.

This, I reckon is turning out to be another joy fest.

Like they say, when life throws you a curve ball, the least one can do it try to hit it.
And you know how I am have always enjoyed sports. Not only to watch, mind you :p, but to play as well ;).

Make no mistake: I am very fine with you as well.
"Hope to have more discussions with you in other topics.:)"

Can not wait.
IndisGuise ;)

Newuser what kind of philosophy is that where you are guilty until you can prove you are innocent? Maoist?

"what if one prepared the write up in one state and than mailed or faxed to his friend in the other state, who logged in with the username...."

I think someone takes this too seriously. Can't help laughing. muhahahahahaha

Well Indi,
You made your points clear. I did it long before. Truth stands where it is and all of us should agree to accept the truth, whatever it is. End of my argument :)

I don't think I can help Indisguise, but what exactly is his grievance particularly when he does not appear to be particularly suspecting himself of being suspected of being somebody else too ?

Yo Nepe My fuggin problem is you....he he are you also going to take credit for spoiling Gyaney 's visit to UN like your dear Republic fren Antimoron? Or like him you are also after the $$$$ only too. he he he

The World may come to an end...but Nepe and his ASSTALK will continue.

Kasto maramar. Yar Ryaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaag garne ja gaye ni, Nepala ni testai, Amricka ni tesati

Nepe, " Maramar" bhanne Gajal Chiana. Aru ta tesati ho Nepeko Gajal Chai Maile Mani

La Jawos Maramar shirshak ko Gajal, Nepe bata

Dear Nepe Sir,

I have had the pleasure of following many of your posting and counter arguments that were presented...for quiet some time. I must admit your thoughts are exceptional and your knowledge of Nepal's politics, very vast. Your arguments on CA being the way out is well justified (certainly that is what Maoist have demanded all along) and yes, I cannot agree with you more on that fact that it is not an option but a must for Nepal to move to a complete democracy. The real question is when, how and what form of democratic system? Sometime back you also made a strong argument that in the heart of the Maoist problem lies the institution of Monarchy. I have thought about it many a times, and I have failed to convince myself how an end to Monarchy is an end to the current problem. Certainly, I agree Monarchy is part of the problem but how is it a panacea? Many of us have been more than willing to stop once we label the Maoist as a bunch of terrorist (I have been as guilty in the past) but really shouldn't we also be asking why do they want CA in the first place? Is CA a means to their end or an end to their means? and most important of all WHO ARE THEY? If I am repeating what some of the folks have already asked or talked about...my apologies but I would appreciate if you could shine some light to some of these daunting questions that are making me lose sleep. (;-))

It is no question that Nepe is politically educated person of certain degree. He is also quite educated on there corners of life. He he must have a well balanced life.

Having said this all, I agree on certain points that Nepe brought out on Sajha from time to time although I disagree with his other points. Nepe and my meeting point is on monarchy-less Nepal. Just like most of the other countries in the world, we also donot need king's grace to run the country. By now, every tax-payer should realize that the monarchism is "SETO HATTI". It has no use at all. We as nepalese should realize by now that monarchims is remanant of feudal structure which is still in existence in most of un-developed countries (most of the african countries). The monarchism exists in Britain as well - some royalist might comment out. Or, others bootlickers might give examples of existing monarchism as well. Then a single question is - what is the whole purpose of having monarchism? Do you want to live a slave life in your country? I expect that those in sajha are well educated people. And personally I have not found any one from intellectual level who truly supports monarchism. Then question arises - who supports monarchism?

1 . Very uneducated people who was portrayed king as a God . This trick worked for a while in Nepal as well because Rana's Ruled the country until very late.

2. Those who are not intellectual level but want to show off on the society through power. And they think, the real power lies with King. If they can please the monarch, they can enjoy power. Good examples are Anchaladhsi, Ksthrapals type of people.

3.A cotire of Military section, who is enjoying the taxpayer's money for nothing. These are the poeple who are nothing from inside but have to showoff on society. Being a military and being close to King gives them a false sense of identity.

4. Political opportunist. These are the people who got always failed in their education, failed in every aspect of life. Politics for them is like holiganism. Examples are Panchyati Gundas.

5. Politically frustrated people who have no political identity but can join whichever group they want for their personal benefit. They are the people as Bhairabh Aryal said " Birali ko ghew dekhi Buhari ko jeuw samma bechne" kind. Most them happen to be hypocrite communists.

6. And finally, those like Sarad Chand Shah. They want to enjoy power from behind the curtain. And so called Rana's who can not even repair the broken wall of their house. They even have no clue how their parents made a house for them (it is actually tax payer's money).

So, We need a total revolution in our coutry if the coutry has to develop. We need a big social revolution. Whether you accept or not, most of the people have child slave back home in Nepal whether he/she is helping in kitchen or in daily house routines. I sometime discuss with my friends about this child slavary in Nepal. Most of the time every one defends saying they are helping those childs, which is morally wrong. And to talk about total revolution with out cleaning chaos is to be a hypocrite.

The first step of this revolution is throw monarchism.

I will post more later.